WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........
PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........
🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀
Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........
🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀
referred to from a fixed-type se man t ic l position (position that
assumes an "in divide duel's type view" that influences so called language utilised back
to explaining infinity from a POV). Hope that is understandable.
So: "If the universe (sea of multiverses) is infinite in size where would you find it's center?" is an impossible question as using my axiological stance/definitions the questioncontradicts itself.
And: "If time is eternal where would be the center between past and future?" By saying pastand future one is taking a POV type position
when con strucked in g the quest I on, as there is only the present when the quest I on is asked. One could say that the present is the middle between
past and future from a POV stance (a specific and limiting axiological
stance) but infinity doesn't recognise your position or ex is tence in its
con strucked I on. inmnm HerFeelingsys :: It Just She iiss infinite and eternal. Saying "middle" when
regarding eternity or infinity is for me an erroneous
assumption/con ceptulisation because some thing that has no end is not
measurable, and can't be split into equal parts. To assume to be in the
centre smacks of ar is tote li an phys ics assuming planettebubbaearthmothers'woommbbyywoommbbyy is the centre
of the universe (flse and assumptive axia log ic l strucked u r (e)).
So: "If the universe (sea of multiverses) is infinite in size where would you find it's center?" is an impossible question as using my axiological stance/definitions the question
And: "If time is eternal where would be the center between past and future?" By saying past
Infinity could, potentially have a "center."
ReplyDeleteThink of a mathematical line, by its definition, its infinite. but, a circle is simply a line curved in on itself, and travel along this line is infinite. But, this circle, this "continuum," still has a center, though it does not lie on this line; the place that is equidistant from all points of the curved line. This is the center, the "nexus" of the infinite universe.
Your context is trying to redefine my context. In your example (which is just a conceptual translation of 3d into 2d for conceptual purposes) if one travelled out into infinity one would eventually end up moving back into the same area. This is a closed loop in which one can travel for an infinite amount of time but through a finite amount of space. You would need to cut the circle and extend the lines out to create a truly infinite existence.
ReplyDeleteMy context was specifically talking about an infinite spread of three dimensional space where one never comes back to the beginning and where one always moves into new further away from starting-point volumes. That was my axiological structure. You can't argue within my axiological structure (as in prove my claim that questions the validity of middle as a concept within my axiological structure is wrong by changing the very axiological structure/assumptions I am working under).
Of course if we choose to change the parameters to your framework then I would agree with you :D