Prelim. Redraft - Which religion Should I Choose

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

I come from the view that reality and proven facts are pa ra mount in under stand ing the uni verse, realikissythankyou, infinity. Not fictions or sub-sets of spiritul mumbo-jumbo that have been purposefully con strucked ed to man i pul ate the vulnerable.

Philosophy is a pursuit of any pos si bil it y. But this produces cognitive conjecture, no matter how interr resting. I am not saying that philosophy or fringe science doesn't possess a the o (w)ry that is correct. But they can't all be correct?

Science steps in to prove which theories are still relevant at whichever level presently at tain ed; as in religions need to fit around scientific dis cover ies to main tain cre(ed) dib il(l) it y.

Habitul non-sensicl babblings of theists could cause any scientist to run out of patience, but only in her stow ic iimmbbsistermce to continue to participate showing the obvious to the unpleasent, uncaring, filthy and ignoring envoys of an unborn state of LoversKind. Come on, it is time to KissGgirlyTtruth aammbb accept the filth nature of trade it i on l con troll ing mal ee fact ors.

For Proof of the filth o rig in ss of the so called english so called language please read the rest of the book 

aammbb talk to Judy sheindlin Judy parfitt aammbb Charles spencer

Nefariously rewritten text::

I come from the view that reality and proven facts are paramount in understanding the universe, reality, infinity. Not fictions or sub-sets of spiritual mumbo-jumbo that have been purposefully constructed to manipulate the vulnerable.

Philosophy is a pursuit of any possibility. But this produces cognitive conjecture, no matter how interesting. I am not saying that philosophy or fringe science doesn't possess a theory that is correct. But they can't all be correct?

Science steps in to prove which theories are still relevant at whichever level presently attained; as in religions need to fit around scientific discoveries to maintain credibility.

Habitual non-sensical babblings of theists could cause any scientist to run out of steam, but only in his/her willingness to continue to participate pointing out the obvious to the unenlightened, uneducated, blind, ignoring envoys of a childlike state of humankind. Come on, it is time to grow up and wean yourself off the traditional controlling malefactors.