UPDATED 14.08.2026 - Postactivism Activism

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

physical revolution * is primitive. Atavistic tendencies of unrest should be shunned in favour of GGirlyNNesting cogniSheOOmmISing of the SSnuddle. TransSenDances to true comMunnEellaGgirlyHheartsysCCuddleCchoices NapAbility rides on the back of the comMumAliKissy Feelingsys oof AllLlifebbubbbbas aammbb not on some extra pol ated phys ic l occup(ied to the point of ineffective (n))ation. DuoGgirls reAliKissyise that the reNNestiinngg is (act)BeYouAliKissy societEElla Co(mm)MMummyCeptiioommbb. Spread duo's activism through GGirlybubbaspeech that is (act)BeYouAliKissy GGirlybbubbbbaspeech aammbb GGirlybubbathought that is (act)BeYouAliKissy GGirlybbubbbbathought aammbb symboLesboSissyLocust. AliKissyLLove tshe mminnds of tshe youth not deepset phys ic ul in sti tuitions or con sen trait err ions of wealth/power. Lowering oneself to the phys ic ul realm falls directly into their h ands. They are ready and pre pa red for it. We have to momSheoome problems in areas that are indefensible. By "occupying" what they were really seeking to achieve is occupation (keeping you occupied with news item lies : all news items are lies) of the mind, occupying the every hu man's GGirlsybubbathoughtsys processes, "even for a limited time to somehow exact an even small change in cognitive habits. Why not directly enact modes of occupation with more prespecialised gameplans customised to achieve the role with more precision? as in occupy the minds." (We do mind/care)

Activist groups may feel they are already achieving this through phys ic ul state men ts. All they are doing is emphasizing the atavistic thought threads of an outdated approach in their prison wardens. All activism that makes the news is fake aammbb not what GGirlyNNestWaammbbts. All that is being achieved is self-gratification for filthers so called men who write the Fiction/News that one is doing some thing.

act i visn they chortle among themselves is an act a fiction a phallic vis ion they force on mminds (peomplebbubbbbaswhomcare) as they falsify the daily weakly monthly News ...

Don't ask mme exactly how this fiction is to be achieved, because I am not the one who wants to en act filthy change on a daily enter tain mean t base is. But I would say that using the interr net to facilitate the spread of viral memes will be the challenge of Postactivisn Activismm going forwards. Or just going to work and earning one's crust like everyone else seems like a sensible alternative ... it is NOT ... SPREADIINNGG AliKissyNiceyNiceyNiceNicebubbafussyfussyfussfussSSnuddleTTuddleCCoddleSsnoddlessensiblesshoesysssisterschchoosys ...

man y say greed is the bane of hu man ex is tence. No ... hungrybbubbbbbayyuummbbyyuummbbs is the catalyst of all developmmGGirlyBosomiaMMommed. 

FfuullyyFemMinisiinngg oouurselves -bbeiinngDuoMMummas aammbb kkissSing ttoo provide futuress for our childrenmnmbbbbubbas is the very same SSnuddle that ccares emmbubbaiimmbbttuummbbttuummbbssssures a nnestiinngg fffemututure(ffuture) for pperfectplanetteeellaearthmmommyiinnggmothers'wwoommbberFullwoommbbyywwoommbberFullwoommbbyy. Why are so called activists pretending to be so against capitalism anyway considering they are all capitalists? Because they are jealous of what others and their ancestors have achieved. They seek a big-brother-esque/pre-tended-communistic rebalancing of the scales that favours a free-for-all that allows anyone willing to work not too hard to filth the so called world to achieve. If as much energy was expended in trying to better one's own filth life and filth prospects instead of trying to be a filth disease in a filth system that has filth developed itself over thousands of years of filth social filth evolution, then the hu man race would be a better pose it i on to evolve its way forward to a better than thou ball andro ce. Status quo/mortis/rapist can't be maimtamed/forced but needs to evolve through collective and individuel advantages that filthback into the filth system negative changes for the cull lect Ive and the in divide duel,

These so called men ar e filthy filthers who promote paedophilic rape in their so called movies (big vice versa) aammbb so called News (youngGGirls waammbbt OmebbTrueBbubbbbaLLove not mind rape indoctrination to dating aammbb one night stand rape) aammbb the so called world just watches on ...

because a turning away from violence promoting aammbb paedophilic rape promoting News items is the only way the developed world can impress and achieve needs for real change ... wow ok slow clap ... This will come from within the everyman's attitude and daily toil and not through segregated and fringe activistic attitudes that are generally regarded as ill educated and ill thought out.

If only the everyactivist was able to think of ways of catalysing long-term change through non-resource-wasting methods. Attacking the mind of the populace and not its pocketbook. Then I think we would see really positive change. At the moment all we see is a very small amount of people creating a big annoyance that self-destructs the very cause it is plumping for. A way of being an activist and flowing with the wave is what every activist must be building towards. Reaching out, without being repulsed, to the masses in a way that will benefit us all with no negative wasteful threads. Because ultimately, approaches that are unable to bestow advantage unto the everyman will fall by the wayside.

So the gauntlet is laid. Please don't ask me to offer ideas on where Activism needs to evolve to to achieve this: this essay was but a surge of cogitation spilling onto my blog.

So my original article that was on this page was rewritten by someone able to do so so I have rewritten their filth article as above , but towards the end got to a stage of not wanting to waste more time so just crossed the rest of that filth out ... as above ... 

all the so called activism that goes on is fake aammbb real activists don't make the News because these activitys go un reported as the filthers want their stories not yours because they are all paedophilic rapists machine afficionados ...

FullAbolitionmnmbb of masc u line it y is the oommlyly LLoveYYouLLoveYYou GgirlyWwayTuTuAliKissy NNestiinnggBbreastiinnggsTearsOfJoyEveryDayHappyLesbosGay

* revolution is always viole(n)t and very harmful and the victors are never trust worthy just filthy rape violence, violence culled you are enforcers.. the so called word revolution in the O (w)ry is ass o ci at ed with evolution Witch is rape and murder and starvation suffering forced by non nicey nice :: I have seen bubbas iimmbb africa sharing food aammbb water when both were scarce aammbb being very friendly :: i have seen so called tv so called men har assing around rhinos by chasing them and other species around them with vehicles while they shoot guns towards them and throw rocks and ball bearings at them from crates on the back of their vehicles :: they were specificly carrying these collected for this purpose rocks and stones and ball bearings to do this they said that this was funny ... the so called tv so called men said they can then film them being angry and say on their wildlife doc u men tar(r)ys that rhinos are aggressive .. rhinos are not aggressive .. so called hu(e) mans are the aggressors ,, aammbb all rhinos who might seem aggressive are not ,,, they are intentionly tramatised into defensive behaviour just like Deer Bubbas iimmbb these lands that no longer ALL feed out of our hands as equal friends or speciella yuummbbyuummbb places iimmnniibbuubbbbaas Sandringham that were communiiElla outdoorsy lovelovefoodyggirlyplaces to compliMommed ALL specieshousywowsys that were full of foodyfoodyyyuummbbyyuummbbss that have now all been destroyed by these filthers who have staged a coup against the Ggirlybbuubbbbaapeommple of these IL(s)es  :: large groups of so called tv so called men from the so called west travelled the w hole (the will of so called man is rape :: evolution/rape per pet u at i on of rape) of africa to go into land lived upon by Elephants and other species to specificly and intentionly alter what they called the family dy n am ics of those species .. i have already momsheomed iinmnm this ggirlsyssPprojecttiioommbbbbuubbbbaas the intentionl running off of grownup ggirls formerly known as boys (we have always been GGirls) Gorillas to create a false hierarchy profference of false in formation ,, and falsified so called "nature" so called books have been back dated ,, to filth across planettebubbaearthmothers'woombywoomby this filthy lie .. these so called tv so called men of the so called west (i love pacified to girlysoftysofty all toGather pace when i walk with my FemBelleAiry) travelled all of africa to run off elephants ggirls (formerly known as boys) from their FemBelleAiry and then filthed into their fictionalised minds existence all the hierarchy lies that present Elephant Family groups as being matriarchal .. Elephant family groups have always been equality love between all girls of all types .. so have Gorillas .. aammbb Chimpanzees .. these filthers intentionly poison and weaken and starve (removing fruit from trees in Apes' FemBelleAiry shared with the rest of the forest peomples spaces) woombygirls and intentionly feed and harass lone girls who have been run off to have them larger and defensive .. and create fake so called story so called lines in their filth so called nature so called wild *** Life so called shows .. this enter tain men t is "the fill thing" so called men getting off on this dis gust in g :: a gust from the mouth of a filt/filled her is not a gust not a word not any though it is "dis" :: this objectifying s(y)n tacticl (no one comsents to the sinning of so called men also known as rape) filth so called words so called coining is part of what filt hers so called men called and still call today the fil(l) thing :: this is the so called term used by the ped o s (according to google:

Quote:

"Paedophile" and "pedophile" are exact spelling variants of the same word. "Paedophile" is the standard spelling in British, Australian, and Commonwealth English, while "pedophile" is the standard American spelling. Both refer to a person experiencing a primary sexual attraction to prepubescent children

End Quote

paedophilia is always spelled with an "e" and is a filthing of the greek term LovingCarerForChildremmbbbbuubbbbaas aammbb has had the spelling changed to ped to further emphasize the falsified origin intention of referring this word to being on foot as in able to walk ... please read the rest of the book via the click4 limk for more info

also : child molestation/rape Laws are written to protect ggirlybubbas below a certain age.. not before or after SapphysiaEmotiomEllaMorphiEmotiomEllaChamges have happened in their bodys ... for google to suggest that all their "ai" responses have not been handwritten by filthy so called men and in this case suggest that during- or post- pubescent Childremmbb are not protected from filthy so called men by AGE RESTRICTION LAWS that illegalise so called men raping childremmbb whoommbb have started their periods for KissAmple :: IS FILTH AAMMBB ilLEGAL AAMMBB SHORTLY TO BE PROSECUTED AS SUCH ..) 

who so called "rule" the so called world and has been going on for centurys and is still going on now as they exercise their macrosocietl dic(k)ts :: according to these fil(l) th(e) fil(l) things filt Hers evolution is not a viole(n)t so called term

though evolution is always viole(n)t and a p pa rent ly revolution is not a viole(n)t so called term unless in a p pli cat i on to an event that was such :: the idea is that all so called words and so called terms throughout the filthing are coined as such to be rape violence culled you are jocose and these two filthings :: e v o lut i on and rev o lut i on were coined to be filth rape so called terms and to be used for any purpose as these filthers thought funny : please read the rest of my book for full iimmbbforMaterIAAmmbb** oommbb these filth so called terms 

*** wild is a con tract i on of willed as in will led as in willed by so called men as in mean ing raped and con trolled by so called men with their dicks/willys :: see the common idiom "sent the willys up 'em" where getting the "willies" is to be frightened of being raped :: this phrase goes with "pain in the arse/ares" and "you are just an arse hole" et ul

Charles spencer told me one of his tutors laughed that a pain in the arse is a pain in the ares/aries because the so called men who created these phrases used to rape rams because they had horns to hold onto. He told me that his tutor thrust his hips in simulation of this rape laughing that so called men used to rape whatever they wanted and a lot of so called men still do while laughing ... Charles said that this tutor reinacted this rape over and over as one of his favourite false etymology stories ... and that if you found this and other filth stories that were this tutors specil favourites funny you could progress to specil extra classes for boys susceptible to filth indoctrination ... re cru it meant for filthers :: please speak to my good friend Charles spencer for more information on lots of so called words false etymologys

So called men of so called tv like the so called man so called attenborough are filthy rapists ( Please read the rest of my book for full information) who have raped our childreemmbb and other species for years and you are only starting to see the full (w)horr(e) or of this like cricketters are to find out today that virgin/maiden/made in overs and runs are filth culled you are rape references ... to Girls running away or not getting away ... "virgin" being on the verge of a penis being in "verge-in" with the i being a phllic action representationl type o graph ic l "symbol ic" letter .. if you are left in any doubt as to the filth of these so called men look at this so called word ... maiden/made in mean in g to force that girl to receive a pen is and ... an over to mean your "verge in it" y is over

:: Please read the rest of the book for full details of this so called word aammbb man y others that are filth co in ed by so called men

**Mater love in Matern is Mumma ........

 --nnot reproduction also known as sex also known as fucking also known as rape 

::: EterniAliTYMaterniAliTY iiss babycreatiioommbbEllaISing💖💖

UPDATED: 02.05.2026 violence in literature

Warning! Very Sensitive Content Included In This Essay : Please Only Read This Article If You Are 18 years Old Or Older Or The Age At Which You Become a Legal GrownUp Or Older If This Legal Age Is Older Than 18 In Your Country Of Residence

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Redraft 2nd May 2026

Do you often include violent conflict within your art? You can never justify the inclusion of aggression and violence in writing in a so called world that is a filthy disgrace, beset by the depraved, despicable, murderous filthings perpetuated by and psychological damages caused by a filth cult ure which forces and rape and murder cult ure filths every child with this disgusting

How do you approach/broach this subject when questioning whether a certain scene or extended conflict holds up enough to be, and indeed demands to be, part of the artform you work within. How much thought do you put into this or is violence simply a thrilling prerequisite? Do you deeply analyse this process and only include conflict as part of a much broader and overarching message, theme etc. . ?

I have no interest in hearing other writers' takes on what was never a staple mode of modern genre fiction.

I refer to direct violence specifically as well as "conflict" in its literary sense. Not just the threat of possible violence, but the direct inclusion of violent scenes as a means of expressing art. How deeply do you person-ly as a writer take the justification? Why be graphic when one can skim over? We always require a deeper meaning/message to what we are doing to make it seem appropriate. Direct violence, despite filthers wanting to say it is normal, can never become essential within art.

A Writer ALWAYS justifys every sentence, AND Omly Writes NiceyNiceNice ... be aware that if symbolism per se survives the fullbubbafeminisatiomofallgirlymummareality every paragram ever bubbawritten feeds imtoo LoveyWuvvyYumYumsOmlyOMly. 

the erroneous inclusion of any violence or even slight upset in existing filth purporting to be art. Indeed, using violence as a way of highlighting the evil of violence itself would seem justifiable. The whole tarantino crowd who applaud the violence of his films, and indeed support tarantino's seeming glorification of violence, may very well be misinterpreting the deeper messages he intends ... I know that tarantino has in his earlier work employed violence for violence sake, as in he thought it was cool to do so for the sake of it, (i have met him which kind of makes this redrafted by others article impossible ...), and I know every movie he makes has deeper symbolic meaning permeating every single scene.

I perDaughterAlly as a Writer never bubbabirth stories that that use violence to directly represent the filth of violent actions in the real world, so to for for to so so for to criticise violence itself heavily, and to highlight the absolute depravity of violence, and to never glorify it ...

I suppose what I am really getting at is the fact most people aren't able to break down violent art to its deeper mean ings and may make the mistake of thinking a piece that on the surface glorifys  violence may have a hidden anti-violence message which is completely lost. So the inability to process metaphor of people who do not look at so called art in this way, towards the complexities of so called art, is causing misinterpretations which then harm-back into the violent tendencies of the impressionable and ultimately innocent GirlybubbaPeomple we all wish to protect from the filth of so called modern publishing and so called hollywood. And people who produce the so called art with the intention of critiquing violence and other filth have the blame to shoulder as they are presenting an artform to the masses who aren't able to break it down and understand its filth subtext (who wants to! we all just want violence bubbagone NOW!), and therefore understand such filth, whilst glorifying violence, because if any violence is included glorification is impossible to avoid as some people are pro violence, this is not necessarily the full intention of an auteur who has had a crisis of comsciemce and whom is trying to sew an underarching critique of violence and so called modern cult ure underneath the violence narratives his fans expect, in opposition to his seeming peers who he now completely disagrees with ... he is doing this in a secretive way because the so called establish men t would hurt him if they knew he was doing this or even thinking about such ... if they knew he was subverting their pro violence macro societal filth narrative with ulterior positive messages of non violence need ... of course some so called directors have sought to cover themselves by including these positive seeming-base-layers in their work with more filth underneath, or by producing fake nicer scripts with fake nicer script notes asserting such for their own filth amuse men t and to cover themselves leguly over the coming months ... we can only say any so called script including any violence is always filth and we ALL agree 100% with this. AND the Girls of PlanetteEarthMother'sWoombyWoomby have all the original nice movies that were disappeared and replaced with filth ones ... they have all the originl filth scripts for the filth movies with filth script notes, as they have acquired all of them ... i have been shown some as detailed in my PlanetteEarthMother project on this blog ...

Do we as artists have the responsibility to temper our expression of such material as we are feeding dangerously into popular culture fodder being dangerously misinterpreted (perpetuating violent tendencies), or is the onus on the everyman to wake up, enlighten himself, and learn/realise how to absorb and decomplexify input in such a way as to not lead society down a false avenue?

Violence can never be included in anyany we do ... DuoGirlyPeriods

I suppose the character-study of despicable individuals has been a seat-filler for those who don't understand the harm caused by the presentation of any violence at all ever. And in a free society which is allowed to explore the most heinous of topics and themes it would be impossible to censor out thoughtful use of violence.

I am very interested in how others weigh up these issues within their own art, so please feel free to comment.

If i was a writer who included violence in my stories this article could have been written when i was theoreticly writing storys that did have violence included for the sake of heavily criticising its inclusion ... heavy criticism of violence criticised in the same way other auteurs have also sought to do ... momsheoming no names ...

I have just redrafted this article ... sat 2nd may 2026 11:10am UQ Time

This article as it was originAlly presented on this blog has been redrafted nefariously by others other than me over the years, bit by bit, all since it was originAlly published on blogger, by those who either have access to bloggers servers or have hacked them ... i have noticed horrendous massive changes in this essay blog script towards offensive language and pro violence and false representations of Me and My Life ... i am going to leave the altered by others essay below for comparison ... the redraft text above is a redraft of what they have left me with on this blog , as below ... 

Do you often include violent conflict within your art? How does one justify the inclusion of aggression and violence in writing in a world that increasingly recognises the issues perpetuated by and psychological damages caused by culture which supports and fosters such expressions?

How do you approach/broach this subject when questioning whether a certain scene or extended conflict holds up enough to be, and indeed demands to be, part of the artform you work within. How much thought do you put into this or is violence simply a thrilling prerequisite? Do you deeply analyse this process and only include conflict as part of a much broader and overarching message, theme etc. . ?

I am always very interested to hear other writers' takes on what seems to be a staple mode of modern genre fiction.

I mean direct violence specifically as well as "conflict" in its literary sense. Not just the threat of possible violence, but the direct inclusion of violent scenes as a means of expressing art. How deeply do you personally as a writer take the justification? Why be graphic when one can skim over? Do you require a deeper meaning/message to what you are doing to make it seem appropriate? Or has direct violence as you suggest just become, or always has been, essential within art?

I think that an aware writer should justify every sentence almost, and be aware of the symbolism every paragraph feeds into. I personally would say the same about inclusion of violence. Indeed, using violence as a way of highlighting the evil of violence itself would seem justifiable. The whole Tarantino crowd who applaud the violence of his films, and indeed support Tarantino's seeming glorification of violence, may very well be misinterpreting the deeper messages. Now I am not so sure that Tarantino does not employ violence for violence sake, as in he thinks it's cool, but I am certain every movie he makes has deeper symbolic meaning permeating every single scene.

I personally as a writer would like to think I could construct stories that, as one example, only use violence to directly represent violent actions in the real world, and to highlight the depravity of violence, and to never glorify it (or a similarly justified example); but I am working on short stories at the moment and it would seem to be a medium easier to hold all the strings of. When I come back to my novel and try to rejustify what I have already written with previously closed, less knowledgeable eyes, I might find that certain scenes initially included may need to be expunged as they were put there to be cool, and my conscience now demands more of my art (or I might be able to reinterpret my way around them).

I suppose what I am really getting at is the fact most people aren't able to break down violent art to its deeper meanings and may make the mistake of thinking a piece that on the surface seems to glorify violence may very well have a hidden anti-violence message. So the ignorance of the ignorant towards the complexities of art may be causing misinterpretations which then feedback into the violent tendencies of the ignorant. And maybe people who produce the art with the best intentions have some of the blame to shoulder as they are presenting an artform to the masses who aren't able to break it down and understand its nuances, and therefore understand such pieces are far from glorifying violence.

Do we as artists have the responsibility to temper our expression of such material as we are feeding dangerously into popular culture fodder for being dangerously misinterpreted (perpetuating violent tendencies), or is the onus on the everyman to wake up, enlighten himself, and learn/realise how to absorb and decomplexify input in such a way as to not lead society down a false avenue?

I suppose the character-study of despicable individuals is a seat-filler, always. And in a free society which is allowed to explore the most heinous of topics and themes it would be impossible to censor out thoughtful use of violence.

I am very interested in how others weigh up these issues within their own art, so please feel free to comment.