Do you often include violent
conflict within your art? How does one justify the inclusion of
aggression and violence in writing in a world that increasingly recognises the
issues perpetuated by and psychological damages caused by culture which
supports and fosters such expressions?
How do you approach/broach
this subject when questioning whether a certain scene or extended
conflict holds up enough to be, and indeed demands to be, part of the
artform you work within. How much thought do you put into this or is
violence simply a thrilling prerequisite? Do you deeply analyse this
process and only include conflict as part of a much broader and
overarching message, theme etc. . ?
I am always very interested to hear other writers' takes on what seems to be a staple mode of modern genre fiction.
I mean direct violence specifically as well as "conflict" in its
literary sense. Not just the threat of possible violence, but the direct
inclusion of violent scenes as a means of expressing art. How deeply do
you personally as a writer take the justification? Why be graphic when
one can skim over? Do you require a deeper meaning/message to what you
are doing to make it seem appropriate? Or has direct violence as you
suggest just become, or always has been, essential within art?
I think that an aware writer should justify every sentence
almost, and be aware of the symbolism every paragraph feeds into. I
personally would say the same about inclusion of violence. Indeed, using
violence as a way of highlighting the evil of violence itself would
seem justifiable. The whole Tarantino crowd who applaud the violence of
his films, and indeed support Tarantino's seeming glorification of
violence, may very well be misinterpreting the deeper messages. Now I am
not so sure that Tarantino does not employ violence for violence sake,
as in he thinks it's cool, but I am certain every movie he makes has
deeper symbolic meaning permeating every single scene.
I
personally as a writer would like to think I could construct stories
that, as one example, only use violence to directly represent violent
actions in the real world, and to highlight the depravity of violence,
and to never glorify it (or a similarly justified example); but I am
working on short stories at the moment and it would seem to be a medium
easier to hold all the strings of. When I come back to my novel and try
to rejustify what I have already written with previously closed, less
knowledgeable eyes, I might find that certain scenes initially included
may need to be expunged as they were put there to be cool, and my
conscience now demands more of my art (or I might be able to reinterpret
my way around them).
I suppose what I am really getting at is the fact most people aren't
able to break down violent art to its deeper meanings and may make the
mistake of thinking a piece that on the surface seems to glorify
violence may very well have a hidden anti-violence message. So the
ignorance of the ignorant towards the complexities of art may be causing
misinterpretations which then feedback into the violent tendencies of
the ignorant. And maybe people who produce the art with the best
intentions have some of the blame to shoulder as they are presenting an
artform to the masses who aren't able to break it down and understand
its nuances, and therefore understand such pieces are far from
glorifying violence.
Do we as artists have the responsibility to
temper our expression of such material as we are feeding dangerously
into popular culture fodder for being dangerously misinterpreted
(perpetuating violent tendencies), or is the onus on the everyman to
wake up, enlighten himself, and learn/realise how to absorb and
decomplexify input in such a way as to not lead society down a false
avenue?
I suppose the character-study of despicable individuals is a
seat-filler, always. And in a free society which is allowed to explore
the most heinous of topics and themes it would be impossible to censor
out thoughtful use of violence.
I am very interested in how others weigh up these issues within their own art, so please feel free to comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment