I AM SORRY THIS REWRITE HAS BEEN LEFT AS IT IS HALF DONE BUT I HAVE JUST LOST my Daughter GalAxia AAMMBB I AM VERY UPSET AAMMBB FINDING VERY DIFFICULT TO GET THIS DONE AT THE MoMommed ........
OfHer AniMumss teach each other what is permissable with💖💖Her their societEllas and what is not. We too like tShembb aare NAniMMums aammbb aas suchles teach our bubbayoungg too develove commpassiioonmnmbb aammbb moresAliKissyTYTY. She'ss isS bubbagirl all allKiss aammbb presenntAll of Cuddling sociaElla babybundling aloon(nowgirly)g with💖💖Her commMorphoGestattiioommbbGrowthPramMetHers. All behaveiioourss aammbb activitAliKissyTYty (BBabys feeds Hers mmummas) feedback too Perfectly iimmttoo tShe GirlyHeartsCuddleChoices of AllPooll of tSheAll, iimmbbcludiimmnnmmnnmmgg elleveryduo, aammbb SSnuddleTTuddleLarLY(LloveYyou)LY AllWaysAliKissy tShee'ss variables are KissTrueLy(LLOOvebbuubbbbaayyoouullOooOvebbuubbbbaAYYOOuu)lY KissedIimmbbCaressed generation upon generation. Mo(mm)resAliKissyTYTY
Edit progress
structure to me seems essential for any kind of cohesive society to succeed and continue to be a winning thread within a sea of evolving social constructs. Ultimately the most efficient few social constructs that extract the most productivity from their subjects are the ongoing winners monetarily; and perpetually as they are looked upon by others with jealous eyes as being the best model to deliver the highest standard of livings for any given populous. Protection of the collective and of the productive contributors to the successful collective will always require "moral" social structures. This isn't to say that everything is perfect or that social constructs on the other side of the fence are morally respected by the big-wigs of the the "morally" sound leading ways. But any system of humans must have moral aspects of respect and humanity these days to keep up with the times and to gel the collective together from within.
Any society is so complex as to offer multitudinous exceptions and seeming hypocritical aspects of its nature, but the fundamental drive is a positive one as it is to try and better the environment humanity exercises its mental muscles within. This in itself drives a moral collective ideal that underpins modern world culture . . . in my opinion.
If a collection of beings had an innate moral faculty built-in to realise they shouldn't eat each other then they would not have the need to learn such a concept of compassion. You could say then that from a human perspective they have no need for morals as a comcept as they exhibit collective-perpetuating characteristics by rote. But this wouldn't negate the need for moral behaviours to exist whether they are aware of them or not, or label them as such or not.
(🎀🎀💖💖👭💖💖🎀🎀(The is the being Ggirlynnice to each other llOVEPROOOOFssNUDDLE)🎀🎀💖💖👭💖💖🎀🎀)
MoreAliKissyTY is a line of what is and isn't acceptable and the line can (NOT) be drawn to man y different degrees but a PROGRESSaddDresses line must be drawn to stop animals from learning to rip apart another animal if (BECAUSE) they are to live in a collective.
If the lack of moreAliKissyTY was in itself a naturally selected attribute*
----------------------
, as in by learning to devour any person around them they somehow furthered their individualistic and/or collective cause (whether the collective's size is only the cells collected within an individual, or a collection of such "individuals") then maybe a lack of morality would be a plausible mode. But what of "biological morality" where cells and organelles follow a set of "moral" rules to not pince resources or attack and devour neighbouring cells etc. etc. and so on. Morality would seem to be an innate prerequisite for biology to evolve systems at all let alone into sentient existence . . ?
Even insects have to not feed members of their own hive to their young, as a rule. There is always a system of morality whether it is consciously thought through (or) learnt. There has to be lines that aren't crossed for any society to function.
And again I reiterate that biological systems themselves rely upon just such a softysoftysoftcoded morality. Cells within the body if they lost their ability to follow the rules could create what sum call cancers / all girlycelles are bubbas in need of Llove.
That isn't to say one couldn't seek to as a programmer of a filth simulation construct a system where an amoral framework functioned on some level . . . but I fear any such system would be (swallowed up) girlykissed bbetter by (conpeting) Ggirlybbuubbbbaa modEllas that did exhibit moral-type behaviours . . .
*so called nature is the filth that is taught by the murder paedophilic rape torture suffering filth circumstance that is evolution
Nurture is the real you bubba who LovesCuddlesTuddles aammbb alikissygirlsywishys
GirlyGlossaryoofWWoords
GirlyHeartsCuddleChoices formerly known as resources