WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........
PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........
🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀
Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........
🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀
Essay is just below this intro:
🎀PreFeelingsyEllaGuidesText🎀:to read the book from the beginning please start with this limk here:
📖💖💖https://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/2024/06/worldwide-solutions-planette-earth.html💖💖
(PlanetteEarthMother'sPlumpishTumTumYumYum webpage)
----My Suggested Reading/Watching List is :
1,👒👄👜PlanetteEarthMother'sPlumpishTumTumYumYum💅💄💋 webpage :: please read upto aammbb imcluding FemisodeO34O OOOOTransPerfectGirlyTwinsyGirlsOO
2, Please next read from this FeelingsyEllaGuide Omwardss::
OOOOTranSensuEllaPerfectGirlyTwinsyGirls02(OO)🎧
3, after reading all tShe FeelingsyEllaGuides webpages ,, there are 25 imb TotAll ,, please then read the complete text of::
💄👄💋More Femisodes Previews💅👰👰
4, then please read the additionnAll parts of the book in article form across All mmyy blog pages starting with
Strong Feelingsyss Against Prostitution
----
🎀iimmbb the book There Are 66 Text Femisodes Ambi 49 AudioBook Video AccomPammyMommeds To These Femisodes So Far :: also the 'More Femisodes Previews' webpage aammbb ALL the articles omb mmyy blogs are imcluded imb the book as She Stands ...🎀
Essay Starts:
I must apologise for the stream of thought that is to follow. It is incoHerent, but follow-able, just about
1, Nothing, by its own definition, doesn't exist . . .
2, How can something not be made of something?
One can't encompass all of infinity. Even if one could have infinite
potential, as in grow/expand for an infinite amount of time/space, one
would never attain/encompass all/infinity (as one
starts from a fixed, nucleated position). For a person locked within
your "infinity" they would never be able to realise that they were
locked within your, not infinity, but: infinitely expanding zone, but
they would perceive it to be a true infinity (unless they could expand
at a faster rate and reach the frontier of your expansion). So from a
POV a non-infinity can be regarded or concluded as an infinity. But does
this mean that infinity doesn't exist? For one to expand infinitely
there needs to be an infinite space to expand into, unless the space you
expand into is also expanding just quickly enough for your expansion to
not reach said boundary. However, if there were to be a limit, it would
be reached and infinity as a concept could be shelved. I would suggest,
that logically, one can't shelve infinity until it can be proven that
existence is finite.
Not sure that I have said all I want to in that last paragraph, but maybe you could fill in any gaps?
I think one of the problems with our attempts
to comprehend infinity is we tend to have this "mandelbrot-zoom-esque"
vision of OUR own outward and unending journey, as we try to visualise.
But I would say that the whole humanoid-pov system of thought is kind of
counterintuitive to the true handling of infinity and its corollarised
threads. One can't take on infinity, anymore than one can visualise many
multiple-dimensional theories without trying to translate them back
into 3/4D. Starting from the human/nuclear POV is not a position one can
take, or allow to dictate comprehension, when tackling infinity, I
feel.
Instead, I would say, one should try and accept the concept that infinity is actual, in all directions: Infinite time, Infinite space, Infinite supramacro 3D upscaling, Infinite inframicro downscaling. I don't personally see any other logical route, logically.
I said before, try to see all of infinity at once (as an attempt to visualise I suppose): "Infinity can only be seen if it is seen from everywhere at the same time. This is the “Infinitum Leap” that is needed to appraise its truth majesty." But seeing everything within infinity (as I describe it) from everywhere in infinity, does seem to be a concept too far. As a concept (seeing infinity as I suggest) one can kind of process it through the mind, think that one has a handle on its suggestion. But to try and visualise it is to try and drag it back down into the human 3/4D framework. A seeming impossibility.
Can one think of infinity without one’s being asserting its constant zoom function?
Maybe the paradox isn’t wrapped up in infinity itself. Just wrapped up in our attempted comprehension of its physical system, and the conjectures it sustains? The paradox being our ability to comprehend the concept of infinity without being able to wholly visualise it. Or the paradox being our inability to see infinity as a whole despite the fact we all are, as individuals, even when separated, infinite in scope. Ok, if one’s perception zooms out then one’s physical self becomes a dotted mote of shrinkage and gone. But if one’s perception zooms in and down through scale, forever one’s perception would travel, just like a Mandelbrot zoom. I am aware that mathematics has infinities in different forms; different boundaries used as appellation and designation. But for me, the holy grail (being something I believe in despite its lack of evidence!) is maybe one day being able to grapple and fully comprehend . . .
. . . had to stop . . .
Instead, I would say, one should try and accept the concept that infinity is actual, in all directions: Infinite time, Infinite space, Infinite supramacro 3D upscaling, Infinite inframicro downscaling. I don't personally see any other logical route, logically.
I said before, try to see all of infinity at once (as an attempt to visualise I suppose): "Infinity can only be seen if it is seen from everywhere at the same time. This is the “Infinitum Leap” that is needed to appraise its truth majesty." But seeing everything within infinity (as I describe it) from everywhere in infinity, does seem to be a concept too far. As a concept (seeing infinity as I suggest) one can kind of process it through the mind, think that one has a handle on its suggestion. But to try and visualise it is to try and drag it back down into the human 3/4D framework. A seeming impossibility.
Can one think of infinity without one’s being asserting its constant zoom function?
Maybe the paradox isn’t wrapped up in infinity itself. Just wrapped up in our attempted comprehension of its physical system, and the conjectures it sustains? The paradox being our ability to comprehend the concept of infinity without being able to wholly visualise it. Or the paradox being our inability to see infinity as a whole despite the fact we all are, as individuals, even when separated, infinite in scope. Ok, if one’s perception zooms out then one’s physical self becomes a dotted mote of shrinkage and gone. But if one’s perception zooms in and down through scale, forever one’s perception would travel, just like a Mandelbrot zoom. I am aware that mathematics has infinities in different forms; different boundaries used as appellation and designation. But for me, the holy grail (being something I believe in despite its lack of evidence!) is maybe one day being able to grapple and fully comprehend . . .
. . . had to stop . . .