Stream/Zoom of Infinity

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

I must apologise for the stream of thought that is to follow. It is incoherent, but follow-able, just about

1, Nothing, by its own definition, doesn't exist . . .

2, How can something not be made of something?

One can't encompass all of infinity. Even if one could have infinite potential, as in grow/expand for an infinite amount of time/space, one would never attain/encompass all/infinity (as one starts from a fixed, nucleated position). For a person locked within your "infinity" they would never be able to realise that they were locked within your, not infinity, but: infinitely expanding zone, but they would perceive it to be a true infinity (unless they could expand at a faster rate and reach the frontier of your expansion). So from a POV a non-infinity can be regarded or concluded as an infinity. But does this mean that infinity doesn't exist? For one to expand infinitely there needs to be an infinite space to expand into, unless the space you expand into is also expanding just quickly enough for your expansion to not reach said boundary. However, if there were to be a limit, it would be reached and infinity as a concept could be shelved. I would suggest, that logically, one can't shelve infinity until it can be proven that existence is finite.

Not sure that I have said all I want to in that last paragraph, but maybe you could fill in any gaps?

I think one of the problems with our attempts to comprehend infinity is we tend to have this "mandelbrot-zoom-esque" vision of OUR own outward and unending journey, as we try to visualise. But I would say that the whole humanoid-pov system of thought is kind of counterintuitive to the true handling of infinity and its corollarised threads. One can't take on infinity, anymore than one can visualise many multiple-dimensional theories without trying to translate them back into 3/4D. Starting from the human/nuclear POV is not a position one can take, or allow to dictate comprehension, when tackling infinity, I feel.

Instead, I would say, one should try and accept the concept that infinity is actual, in all directions: Infinite time, Infinite space, Infinite supramacro 3D upscaling, Infinite inframicro downscaling. I don't personally see any other logical route, logically.

I said before, try to see all of infinity at once (as an attempt to visualise I suppose): "Infinity can only be seen if it is seen from everywhere at the same time. This is the “Infinitum Leap” that is needed to appraise its truth majesty." But seeing everything within infinity (as I describe it) from everywhere in infinity, does seem to be a concept too far. As a concept (seeing infinity as I suggest) one can kind of process it through the mind, think that one has a handle on its suggestion. But to try and visualise it is to try and drag it back down into the human 3/4D framework. A seeming impossibility.

Can one think of infinity without one’s being asserting its constant zoom function?

Maybe the paradox isn’t wrapped up in infinity itself. Just wrapped up in our attempted comprehension of its physical system, and the conjectures it sustains? The paradox being our ability to comprehend the concept of infinity without being able to wholly visualise it. Or the paradox being our inability to see infinity as a whole despite the fact we all are, as individuals, even when separated, infinite in scope. Ok, if one’s perception zooms out then one’s physical self becomes a dotted mote of shrinkage and gone. But if one’s perception zooms in and down through scale, forever one’s perception would travel, just like a Mandelbrot zoom. I am aware that mathematics has infinities in different forms; different boundaries used as appellation and designation. But for me, the holy grail (being something I believe in despite its lack of evidence!) is maybe one day being able to grapple and fully comprehend . . .

. . . had to stop . . .

Which religion Should I Choose?

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

I come from the view that reality and proven facts are paramount in understanding the universe, reality, infinity. Not fictions or sub-sets of spiritual mumbo-jumbo that have been purposefully constructed to manipulate the vulnerable.

Philosophy is a pursuit of any possibility. But this produces cognitive conjecture, no matter how interesting. I am not saying that philosophy or fringe science doesn't possess a theory that is correct. But they can't all be correct?

Science steps in to prove which theories are still relevant at whichever level presently attained; as in religions need to fit around scientific discoveries to maintain credibility.

Habitual non-sensical babblings of theists could cause any scientist to run out of steam, but only in his/her willingness to continue to participate pointing out the obvious to the unenlightened, uneducated, blind, ignoring envoys of a childlike state of humankind. Come on, it is time to grow up and wean yourself off the traditional controlling malefactors.

Are Reality and the Physical the Same?

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

REDRAFTING THIS TEXT ON computer

nefariously rewritten article text :

  

It would seem plausible that in the same way we think of an animal consciousness (dog, cat or some such) we indeed may be party to a limited form of consciousness. Indeed I don't doubt a higher level of consciousness awaits the combination of genetic and nanobotic engineering (or other future level of consciousness). It could be possible that humans (if existing in an illusory/simulatory world) are

simply simplifications of a level of consciousness far higher, indeed in a universe designed and balanced in such a way that the possibility of higher consciousness exists: it would seem statistically more likely that we are in a simulation (subjects of a god) than in a real universe. It would seem that it is statistically more likely that we are mere shadows of a form of consciousness far grander than ours. This is however far from conclusive, and not an idea I am comfortable with or even willing to peddle as anything close to fact. Numbers are ultimately manipulatable (a perfect medium in which to sculpt an existence).

Some say consciousness itself is hard if not impossible to explain as regards why it exists. Why does it need to exist when the brain has its abilities, abilities to deal with problems and issues. Why is consciousness, awareness of oneself, needed?

Is it not simply a construct/simulation created by the brain to link together the different functions/abilities/areas of the brain and enable a being to connect these functions in the brain and problems in the external world (input areas of brain) to the problem solving areas that are required to deal with them and so guarantee survival.

Would a brain running without consciousness be able to do even the simplest of tasks? Isn't an orchestrator needed, one that needs to be aware?

So now we move to this post's subject. Are reality and the physical world the same? Of course they aren't. Anyone's personal reality is a mere 10th of a second late reflection of the external physical world. Taking any hallucinogen and being able to maintain ones understanding that what one is experiencing is not real despite the realistic/vivid properties of the altered state is testament to the fact that personal reality is capricious and malleable.

I would say that reality is what it needs to be. Whatever it needs to be to be able to prevent its extensions (the body) from being no longer able to support that reality. Reality itself is evolved to self perpetuate itself. We need to be aware so we are. We need to be conscious so we are. Reality is the way it is to allow understanding and interaction with the external physical world. Separate and different but indelibly linked.

re·al·i·ty
/riˈælɪti/ Show Spelled[ree-al-i-tee] Show IPA
noun, plural re·al·i·ties for 3, 5–7.
1.
the state or quality of being real.
2.
resemblance to what is real.
3.
a real thing or fact.

In the "hallucinogen" section I was separating the physical world (what some would term reality) from "personal reality" (see second definition of reality above). Of course a hallucinogen does not alter physical reality, but it does alter a "personal (sense of) reality", which is what I was referring to. Of course the whole exercise was in the name of ideas to do with the separation of the physical world from reality (I chose my interpretation of the word "reality" to be what we perceive the world as being, in our minds, not what is empirically testable as being actual physical reality).

EDITED 31.07.2026 : What it takes to be a Real Man

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

men forcing Girls to have sex with them.

men forcing Girls to have sex with them when they want.

men forcing Girls to have sex with them more often.

men forcing Girls to have sex with them period, to me constitutes rape* : men persuading Girls to have sex with them period, to me constitutes rape.

men forcing Girls to want to have sex with them period, to me constitutes rape : men persuading Girls to want to have sex with them period, to me constitutes rape .

 

Whether the man uses his physicl power to rape, kicks his the Wife out of the bed unless she gives in, withholds money, uses emotionl blackmail**, or goes off sleeping around to emotion manipulate her into thinking it’s all her fault and that she is obliged to give him what he wants***. In the eyes of The Law in the UK all of these things would constitute a rape charge. But alas, so many men carry on perpetrating these types of crimes because for some reason they think they are owed some thing, or they feel cheated because their the wife is men o pause l and not feeling like having sex. "I am a man and I have feelings, I have needs." fucking(also know as raping) disgusting ... (the so called word men o pause was coined (double mean in g ed (co in ed)) to show the attitude of men who believe in con ju gal rape rights/rites as being such that all gals are expected to "pause" briefly ownly during this time and then go straight back to taking cocks ... )

 

I would say that any of these disgusting techniques are to me as abhorrent as the acts of someone like Jimmy Savile (maybe worse, as Savile was clearly a clinical psychopath, whereas (ani mal) husband(ry)s are doing this to the one they "Love"). Using a position of power, whether given by institution or by “god given abilities”, instead of trying to cuddle a mutual position of Love, is for me atavism to the highest degree. But how can we approach these old out of touch men who seek to foster(s) an en vir on men t that leads to this way of thinking. How can we make them realise they are owed nothing, and that if they would like some thing they should work at it, or even sometimes put-up and shut-up/forget-about-it? How can we get them to shoulder the blame and change their ways, to realise they have to provide safety and protection for Girls without the expectation of sexul favours on de man d? Maybe we can’t teach older dogs new tricks (and happily we can put them down gently as they are supposedly humans not animums), but we can, by peace, bring up the next generation to realise that men have no special sexul dispensation: a mode man y men are attempting to man i pul ate/per pet u ate within the mod ern socil con text.

There is a big difference between working and striving to please AGirl, and using so called words to get what you want.

For all you Girls out there who worry that the next generation won’t move onwards to a more civilised state of sociAliKissy SSnuddleTTuddleCcoddleSsnoddle, I can say with my hand on my heart that I as a father aammbbtutu embubbasure my son understands his responsibilities fully, without amy erroneous feeling of  en title men t.

Is being a real man being one who creates and coprovides? in an automatiioommbb GGirlyNNestFuture GGirlyNNestProvides; without the recognition that GGirls are to be CCuddledTTuddledCCoddledSSnoddled aammbb GGirlyLLoved aammbb reFeelingsyed, at all timebbss, for the Woommbberfull aammbb BeAutiLLoveFull emmBosomySSnuddleLlovers they are.

* "Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse, which is initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority or with a person who is incapable of valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, or below the legal age of consent." 

Source Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape

** Rape via emotional blackmail: http://www.welfare.qmul.ac.uk/wellbeing/problems/assault/index.html

*** Marital rape by coercion: "Increasingly, researchers have begun to use broad definitions of sexual violence to more fully understand many women's experiences of ""unwanted sex"" or sex out of a sense of obligation or ""wifely duty"" (Basile, 2002; DeKeseredy & Joseph, in press; Finkelhor & Yllo, 1985).  For example, Finkelhor and Yllo (1985) note the importance of social coercion (the pressure women feel to have sex as a result of social and cultural expectations of marriage as an institution) and interpersonal coercion (women who feel pressured to have sex when non-violent threats such as withholding money or child support are made) in women's experiences of marital rape.  In their study of women who are sexually assaulted when they are separated or divorced from their partners, DeKeseredy and Joseph (in press) classify women's experiences into four categories including sexual contact, sexual coercion (which includes unwanted intercourse as a result of verbal pressure), attempted rape, and rape.  Each of these conceptualizations is important in helping us to understand the complexities and nuances of women's experiences of sexual violence with their partners.  As we will address later, it is important for practitioners who are involved in trying to end violence against women to see marital rape in all of its forms and complexities in order to assist survivors." 

Source (please see paragraph 14): http://www.vawnet.org/print-document.php?doc_id=248&find_type=web_desc_AR

Links: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12477095

If you are suffering at the will of your partner please consider one of the below links: 
http://www.rapecrisis.org.uk
http://www.rainn.org