Infinite possible configurations of matter.

WARNING VERY SENSITIVE AND UPSETTING CONTENT IS INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. This Project Is Composed Of A BOOK In Text Form Here Om The Blog With Accompanying Videos For Most Of The Femisodes........

PLEASE ONLY READ ON IF YOU ARE 18 YEARS OLD OR OLDER OR THE AGE YOU BECOME A LEGAL GROWN UP IN YOUR COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE IF THAT IS OLDER THAN 18 YEARS OLD........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Please Kiss a few slow comfy breathSSnuddles before you deciissiioommbb to read the GGirlyTtext emmbbubbassnuddledttuddled iimmnniibbubbas this GgirlyNnest immbbSistermce........

🎀🎀🌈🌈💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖🌈🌈🎀🎀

Maybe the Universe's individuality, its configuration, is decided by differences that themselves have an infinite amount of possible states/configurations. Infinite amounts of laws of physics if you will, not only on our plane (quantum to edge of visible universe or other universe on comparable scale of resolution), but also going down in scale infinitely, into the infrascopic past Planck and beyond without end. So if matter is tied into its inner states going down infinitely, the permutations of these possible inner states are also infinite? due to this infinity there is no way another earth could exist that is the same because it is inextricably linked to an infinite system that expresses itself in an infinite amount of possible variations. So there are no repetitions.

And so, if one travels out into our visible universe or outside of it into an infinite expanse of our universe or indeed a universe beyond it that is one constituent of a multiverse, on our scale of existence, there are no copies of our earth or of oneself out there in infinity because the possible configurations of matter/existence, are endless ways in which to be expressed. 

I suppose the question to ask is whether an infinite amount of possible configurations is contingent upon being tied into an infinite internal history or not? Or whether the amount of possible configurations can be limitless within a POV scale that ends around-abouts planck?

So how does the prior sit with determinism? Does an infinite possible amount of states mean matter can be anywhere other than where it's supposed to be? Would there have to be an infinitely precise method of configuring these states to take on their properties? Would an infinite expanse of the infinitesimal infrascopic scales of matter, if linked to matter on our scale, cause an infinite chain of cause and effect that can't be reconciled theoretically?


I personally wouldn't talk about predetermined, though all movement is cause and effect; decisions are make-able, just a sequence of events that leads to present state.

Within the infinitesimal cause and effect chain there could indeed be a lack of cause and effect (lack of time-lag anyway) because internal states are directly linked to the larger. So instead of a history, it exists as simultaneous movements on an infinite scale. 

This seems like quite a decision to make. Direct instant effections, or cause and effect internal histories spiralling down infinitely with time a factor that builds up the further one goes.  

Different draft:

The idea that if existence on our scale stretches out infinitely then there must be repetition, as in copies of the Earth and ourselves, is contingent on the idea that the mode in which matter finds itself within our local/visible universe is somehow the norm for infinity. This is in my mind a big assumption. I think along the lines that the way matter, as we know it, is constructed from infrascopic realms is simply one in a possibly infinite amount of variations of possible configurations of materiel from within an infinity that not only stretches out on our scale of view, but also stretches infinitely downwards in scale into the infrascopic, and upwards in scale into the suprascopic. The infinite possible makeups of any such bubble (subjective POV) therefore negates the idea that copies within their respective stratigraphical layers are possible, or at least makes the chances of copies being out there far far more remote than we may think?